The Texas Titans Gang Up: Perot Systems and Dell Make Enterprise Services Play – Late to the Game

September 23, 2009 at 9:40 pm Leave a comment

bvanni-printFor me, it’s a pretty simple debrief.  Dell has been increasingly trying to gain relevance in the enterprise, with both servers, storage and services.

They had no real comparable services arm to compete with EDS/HP or IBM G.S.   They are worried about getting further commoditized at the device/PC level and about not having an offsetting high margin services play.   They’re smart enough to know they can only streamline their cost structure so low and become further efficient at commodity PCs as a sustainable business strategy for so long.   They also were last to the game with a meaningful outsourcing services offer.   Lastly, they also needed vertical industry practices to gain more business user relevance (and stop selling on price & feature/function to the IT Director).   So, Perot brings them all of those things, with a stated focus and successful history in a couple of big verticals (gov’t. and healthcare).

It just seems to me like Dell paid a HUGE price for this (60%+ premium over current stock value).   But the clock was ticking.

As it relates to making a big play in the Data Center, Dell’s strategy and strength remains to be seen.  I guess it will depend on how they package the server products, services and non-server devices (storage, networking) into an integrated, branded offer.   To compete with IBM in that space will take decades.   Services is really not in Dell’s DNA, so it will be interesting to watch how they manage this set of assets from Perot and integrate it.   The only other big guys they could have bought this way that would have given them a comparable set of assets would have been CSC, Deloitte or one of the Indian offshore SI’s – or some federal integrator (but that would be too vertical specific).

I think what will be interesting to watch will be how Dell uses its consumer and SMB insights to creatively package Professional Services and managed services into “commodity” packages of computing-as-a-service to enterprise accounts.  Meaning, can a largely consumer-oriented brand dominate in the market because they understand how the user wants to use technology — as the market moves to SaaS, managed services and mobility computing??    How far out of their selling and marketing “comfort-zone” will this acquisition take them?

For Dell solution providers (or those interested in becoming their channel partners) caution should be the watchword when evaluating how the Austin-based PC maker will weave Perot’s services competency into their channel engagement programs – or not.   Greg Davis, Dell’s Channel Chief,  recently hired a channel veteran, Nancy Reynolds (previously Trend Micro and Novell)  to lead their enterprise channel strategy.   And, they are certainly investing in training, enablement and performance incentive programs for their growing indirect channel partners.  But, many solution providers still vow to never “partner” with Dell, citing their historic direct-only selling model and bias.

It’s back to the big question of “what’s the enterprise data center backbone?”  The network?  The computing devices?   The business applications?   It seems to me that he who owns the network infrastructure will be the puppeteer with all the strings in the next decade, at least as it relates to selling discreet technology.  We see Cisco to be the one to beat there – and we all know this company’s commitment and resources allocated to partnering.  But, he who can package standard IT components into a meaningful service offer and back it up with strong SLAs and outsourcing services will be the one to whom the user writes the ultimate check.   Further, the company who can harness the services opportunity AND do it through a scalable, empowered indirect channel organization will surely prevail.

The winner of that battle remains to be seen.  I’d place my money as of today on IBM first, HP second, Cisco third and Dell last.

More on Dell/Perot: What Will Dell/Perot Mean to Dell Reseller Channel Partners?

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Industry Perspective. Tags: , , , , , , .

Channel Complexity – Vendor/Partner Marriage Counseling The Clouds Begin To Part: Where Do Distributors Fit After The Storm?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 27 other followers

Recent Posts

Share This Blog

Share

Categories

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

%d bloggers like this: